Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs MiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 27B Google

29.2

Rank #302 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

42.9

Rank #91 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 36.4 to 10.0.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.65 / $0.65 for Gemma 2 27B.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 8K.
  • Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index29.242.9
Released2024-06-242026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window8K262K
Max output2K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.65$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.65$0.28
Results tracked3418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243), MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding12111467
BigCodeBench Instruct42.8%—
LiveBench Coding36%—
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313), MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts11991445
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
DTBench48%—
LiveBench Data Analysis47.9%—
LMCA7.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.06—
LiveBench38.2%—

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306), MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math12121432
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.4%—
LiveBench Math26.5%—
MATH Level 527.9%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert11721449
GPQA Diamond36.5%—
Confabulations27.1%—
MMLU75.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision—1228

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221), MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English12171404
LMArena Chinese12211469
LMArena French12461448
LMArena German12091398
LMArena Japanese11751318
LMArena Korean11741355
LMArena Russian12341412
LMArena Spanish12281432

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following12061428
LiveBench Instruction Following58.1%—

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query12311442

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

BenchmarkGemma 2 27BMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text12311424
LMArena Creative Writing12411393
LMArena Multi-Turn12241446
LiveBench Language32.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Gemma 2 27B lists at $0.65 and $0.65.

Is Gemma 2 27B or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper