Model comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Gemma 2 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 27B Google

29.4

Rank #312 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 27B scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 27B leads 44.2 to 27.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Language: 32.6% for Gemma 2 27B and 9.2% for Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct.

Side by side

Gemma 2 27B and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Gemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index29.427.9
Released2024-06-242024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window8K—
Max output2K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.65—
Output $ / M tokens$0.65—
Results tracked3435

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Coding36%15.5%
LMArena Coding12111093
BigCodeBench Instruct42.8%—
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%26.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts11981072
LiveBench Data Analysis47.9%34.7%
LiveBench38.2%22.4%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench48%—
LMCA7.1%—
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index122.08—
HellaSwag—76.7%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Math26.5%15.7%
LMArena Math12121111
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.4%—
MATH Level 527.9%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert11721045
MMLU75.7%68.8%
GPQA Diamond36.5%—
Confabulations27.1%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12171021
LMArena Chinese12211021
LMArena French12471076
LMArena German12091044
LMArena Japanese1175935
LMArena Korean1174905
LMArena Russian12341022
LMArena Spanish12281085

Instruction Following Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following58.1%39.1%
LMArena Instruction Following12061053

Long Context Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12311044

Writing & Preference Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text12311073
LMArena Creative Writing12411037
LMArena Multi-Turn12241018
LiveBench Language32.6%9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Gemma 2 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 27B or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper