Model comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Pixtral Large

Pixtral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 2 27B costs 4.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Pixtral Large's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 27B Google

29.4

Rank #312 Confirmed

Pixtral Large Mistral AI

32.2

Rank #259 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 27B leads 44.2 to 32.9.
  • Gemma 2 27B is cheaper at $0.65 / $0.65 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
  • Pixtral Large accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 8K.

Side by side

Gemma 2 27B and Pixtral Large specifications
Gemma 2 27BPixtral Large
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index29.432.2
Released2024-06-242024-11-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window8K128K
Max output2K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.65$2
Output $ / M tokens$0.65$6
Results tracked343

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246), Pixtral Large: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPixtral Large
BigCodeBench Instruct42.8%—
LiveBench Coding36%—
LMArena Coding1211—
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—

Reasoning Pixtral Large leads

Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPixtral Large
EnigmaEval—0.8%
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1198—
DTBench48%—
LiveBench Data Analysis47.9%—
LMCA7.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.08—
LiveBench38.2%—

Math Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311), Pixtral Large: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPixtral Large
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.4%—
LiveBench Math26.5%—
LMArena Math1212—
MATH Level 527.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280), Pixtral Large: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPixtral Large
GPQA Diamond36.5%—
Confabulations27.1%—
LMArena Expert1172—
MMLU75.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPixtral Large
LMArena Vision—1089

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226), Pixtral Large: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPixtral Large
LMArena Non-English1217—
LMArena Chinese1221—
LMArena French1247—
LMArena German1209—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1174—
LMArena Russian1234—
LMArena Spanish1228—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249), Pixtral Large: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPixtral Large
LiveBench Instruction Following58.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1206—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218), Pixtral Large: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPixtral Large
LMArena Longer Query1231—

Writing & Preference Gemma 2 27B leads

Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BPixtral Large
LMArena Text1231—
LMArena Creative Writing1241—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—988
LMArena Multi-Turn1224—
LiveBench Language32.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than Pixtral Large?

Pixtral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 2 27B costs 4.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Pixtral Large's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Pixtral Large?

Gemma 2 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

Pixtral Large does, with 128K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 27B and Pixtral Large share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 27B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper