Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 2 2b IT vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 2b IT Google

33.1

Rank #248 Confirmed

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 21.4.
  • Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2 2b ITGrok 4.6
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index33.156.9
Released—2026-08-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1749

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGrok 4.6
LMArena Coding11121465
DeepSWE—67.5%
FrontierCode—48%
CursorBench—41.4%
LMArena WebDev—1617
FrontierSWE—25.3%
SciCode—56.5%
WeirdML—67.3%
ALE-Bench—1,508

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGrok 4.6
APEX-Agents—65.3%
GDP.pdf—17.2%
Vending-Bench 2—9,047

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGrok 4.6
LMArena Hard Prompts11131447
ARC-AGI-2—67.1%
SimpleBench—75.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—80%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—19.7%
Chess Puzzles—40%
EBR-Bench—30.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
DTBench—97.3%
LMCA—48.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.44

Math Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGrok 4.6
LMArena Math11351423
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—66%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—51%

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGrok 4.6
LMArena Expert10961467
GPQA Diamond—94%
SimpleQA Verified—49.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGrok 4.6
LMArena Vision—1263
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.2%
Furniture Assembly—40%
LMArena Document—1452

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGrok 4.6
LMArena Non-English11211420
LMArena Chinese11321480
LMArena French11571461
LMArena German11141431
LMArena Japanese10831376
LMArena Korean10551397
LMArena Russian11181422
LMArena Spanish11401404

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGrok 4.6
LMArena Instruction Following11181431

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGrok 4.6
LMArena Longer Query11301454

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)

BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITGrok 4.6
LMArena Text11561428
LMArena Creative Writing11471428
LMArena Multi-Turn11181425

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Grok 4.6 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper