Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Kimi K2.5 Instant
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.6 to 36.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 43.6 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1484 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1404 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1443 |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1442 |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1440 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1449 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1430 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1435 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1381 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1427 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.