Model comparison

Gemma 2 2b IT vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 2b IT Google

33.1

Rank #248 Confirmed

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K3 leads 63.0 to 21.4.

Side by side

Gemma 2 2b IT and Kimi K3 specifications
Gemma 2 2b ITKimi K3
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index33.159.5
Released—2026-07-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$3
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked1753

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITKimi K3
LMArena Coding11121508
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
LMArena WebDev—1654
FrontierSWE—25.9%
SciCode—59.5%
WeirdML—82.6%
ALE-Bench—1,524

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITKimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITKimi K3
LMArena Hard Prompts11131496
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—39%
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
DTBench—91.2%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
Epoch Capabilities Index—157.45
ForecastBench—61.1

Math Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITKimi K3
LMArena Math11351491
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—72.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—39%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—87.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—87%

Knowledge Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITKimi K3
LMArena Expert10961521
GPQA Diamond—93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITKimi K3
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITKimi K3
LMArena Non-English11211466
LMArena Chinese11321529
LMArena French11571491
LMArena German11141488
LMArena Japanese10831487
LMArena Korean10551458
LMArena Russian11181482
LMArena Spanish11401472

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITKimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following11181483

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITKimi K3
LMArena Longer Query11301494

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 2b ITKimi K3
LMArena Text11561476
LMArena Creative Writing11471454
LMArena Multi-Turn11181488
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2082
EQ-Bench 4—1339

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Kimi K3 better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Kimi K3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper