Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Gemma 2 2b IT and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.1 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 29.9 to 19.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 32.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1210 |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1208 |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
Knowledge Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Gemma 2 2b IT and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.1 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.