Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Wizardlm 13b
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 36.5 to 30.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1035 |
Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1018 |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1048 |
Long Context Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Wizardlm 13b?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.