Model comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.9

Rank #341 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 5 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 31.6 to 9.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 34.7% for Gemma 2 9B and 29.6% for Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct.

Side by side

Gemma 2 9B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Gemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index25.929.7
Released2024-06-242024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3519

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct34.7%29.6%
LMArena Coding11731039
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%40.6%
LiveBench Coding22.5%—

Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11711028
LiveBench Reasoning15.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis36.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.83—
LiveBench28.7%—
PIQA83.7%—

Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math11831089
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%—
LiveBench Math19.8%—
MATH Level 521%—
GSM8K84.9%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1147984
GPQA Diamond27.5%—
BoolQ85.7%—
MMLU72.1%—

Multilingual Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English11881000
LMArena Chinese11851016
LMArena French11901039
LMArena German11861006
LMArena Japanese1144899
LMArena Korean1137856
LMArena Russian12001004
LMArena Spanish12001059

Instruction Following Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11781023
LiveBench Instruction Following52.6%—

Long Context Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1197996

Writing & Preference Gemma 2 9B leads

Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text12071050
LMArena Creative Writing12061024
LMArena Multi-Turn1193989
EQ-Bench Creative Writing841—
LiveBench Language25.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 9B better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 9B or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.4 vs 28.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper