Model comparison

Gemma 2B vs Gemma 3 12B

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2B Google

29.6

Rank #307 Confirmed

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 3 12B in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3 12B leads 47.5 to 24.0.

Side by side

Gemma 2B and Gemma 3 12B specifications
Gemma 2BGemma 3 12B
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index29.632.1
Released2024-02-212025-03-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked2324

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGemma 3 12B
LMArena Coding10101281
SciCode—17.4%
HumanEval+20.7%—
MBPP+34.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGemma 3 12B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—30.4%

Reasoning Gemma 2B leads

Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGemma 3 12B
LMArena Hard Prompts9891309
Epoch Capabilities Index94.2123.5
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—48.8%
LMCA—4.5%
BIG-Bench Hard35.2%—
HellaSwag71.4%—
PIQA77.3%—
WinoGrande65.4%—

Math Gemma 2B leads

Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGemma 3 12B
LMArena Math10091307
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—16.7%
GSM8K17.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGemma 3 12B
GPQA Diamond—39.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.4%
LMArena Expert—1248
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.1%—
BoolQ69.4%—
MMLU42.3%—
TriviaQA53.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, Gemma 3 12B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGemma 3 12B
MindCube—46.7%

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGemma 3 12B
LMArena Non-English9581318
LMArena Russian9371335
LMArena Chinese986—
LMArena German—1370

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGemma 3 12B
LMArena Instruction Following9701299

Long Context Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGemma 3 12B
LMArena Longer Query9811317

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGemma 3 12B
LMArena Text10021334
LMArena Creative Writing9871331
LMArena Multi-Turn9451334
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1126

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2B better than Gemma 3 12B?

Gemma 3 12B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2B or Gemma 3 12B better for coding?

Gemma 3 12B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.7 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Gemma 3 12B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 12B has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper