Model comparison

Gemma 2B vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2B Google

29.6

Rank #307 Confirmed

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

53.3

Rank #36 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6 Luna in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Luna leads 76.1 to 30.0.
  • Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 2B and GPT-6 Luna specifications
Gemma 2BGPT-6 Luna
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index29.653.3
Released2024-02-212026-09-22
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked2342

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Coding10101439
DeepSWE—66.6%
FrontierCode—42.4%
LMArena WebDev—1581
SciCode—54.6%
ALE-Bench—1,577
HumanEval+20.7%—
MBPP+34.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-6 Luna
APEX-Agents—44.3%
GDP.pdf—23%

Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Hard Prompts9891411
Epoch Capabilities Index94.2156.28
ARC-AGI-2—59.3%
NYT Connections (extended)—68.7%
ARC-AGI-1—86.7%
CritPt—19.4%
Chess Puzzles—31%
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—90.1%
LMCA—44.5%
BIG-Bench Hard35.2%—
HellaSwag71.4%—
PIQA77.3%—
WinoGrande65.4%—

Math GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Math10091416
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—78.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4—56.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—98.9%
ProofBench—64%
GSM8K17.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-6 Luna
GPQA Diamond—90.5%
SimpleQA Verified—41.4%
LMArena Expert—1444
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.1%—
BoolQ69.4%—
MMLU42.3%—
TriviaQA53.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Vision—1217
Blueprint-Bench 2—31.2%
Furniture Assembly—44.2%

Multilingual GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Non-English9581386
LMArena Chinese9861433
LMArena Russian9371394
LMArena French—1420
LMArena German—1369
LMArena Japanese—1369
LMArena Korean—1360
LMArena Spanish—1393

Instruction Following GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Instruction Following9701409

Long Context GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Longer Query9811409

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads

Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BGPT-6 Luna
LMArena Text10021391
LMArena Creative Writing9871363
LMArena Multi-Turn9451396

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2B better than GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2B or GPT-6 Luna better for coding?

GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and GPT-6 Luna share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper