Model comparison

Gemma 2B vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2B Google

29.6

Rank #307 Confirmed

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K3 leads 76.6 to 24.0.

Side by side

Gemma 2B and Kimi K3 specifications
Gemma 2BKimi K3
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index29.659.5
Released2024-02-212026-07-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$3
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked2353

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BKimi K3
LMArena Coding10101508
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
LMArena WebDev—1654
FrontierSWE—25.9%
SciCode—59.5%
WeirdML—82.6%
ALE-Bench—1,524
HumanEval+20.7%—
MBPP+34.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BKimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BKimi K3
LMArena Hard Prompts9891496
Epoch Capabilities Index94.2157.45
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
CritPt—23.4%
Chess Puzzles—39%
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
DTBench—91.2%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
BIG-Bench Hard35.2%—
ForecastBench—61.1
HellaSwag71.4%—
PIQA77.3%—
WinoGrande65.4%—

Math Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BKimi K3
LMArena Math10091491
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—72.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—39%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—87.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—87%
GSM8K17.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BKimi K3
GPQA Diamond—93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%
LMArena Expert—1521
ARC (AI2) Challenge42.1%—
BoolQ69.4%—
MMLU42.3%—
TriviaQA53.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2B: —, Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BKimi K3
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BKimi K3
LMArena Non-English9581466
LMArena Chinese9861529
LMArena Russian9371482
LMArena French—1491
LMArena German—1488
LMArena Japanese—1487
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BKimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following9701483

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BKimi K3
LMArena Longer Query9811494

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2BKimi K3
LMArena Text10021476
LMArena Creative Writing9871454
LMArena Multi-Turn9451488
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2082
EQ-Bench 4—1339

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2B better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2B or Kimi K3 better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Kimi K3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper