Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Llama 4 Scout
Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Llama 4 Scout leads 41.3 to 23.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 27.4 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2025-04-05 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300), Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1286 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9.1% |
| SciCode | — | 17% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.1% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.1% |
Reasoning Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275), Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1266 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | 129.64 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 0.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 57.9% |
| LMCA | — | 12% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237), Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1286 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 37.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 62.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 51.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 74.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1236 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1118 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 34.2% |
Multilingual Llama 4 Scout leads
Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289), Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1253 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1256 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1263 |
| LMArena French | — | 1283 |
| LMArena German | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1277 |
Instruction Following Llama 4 Scout leads
Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297), Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1248 |
| IFEval | — | 81.8% |
Long Context Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286), Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1265 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 36% |
Writing & Preference Llama 4 Scout leads
Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303), Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1249 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1281 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 783 |
| WildBench | — | 78% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Llama 4 Scout?
Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?
Gemma 2B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.9 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Llama 4 Scout share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.