Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.6 to 24.1.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.