Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Phi-4 Mini
Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Phi-4 Mini leads 22.4 to 18.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 30.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Phi-4 Mini?
Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Gemma 2B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.4 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.