Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Yi-1.5-34B
Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and Yi-1.5-34B in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Yi-1.5-34B leads 37.6 to 24.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 30.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300), Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1160 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Gemma 2B leads
Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1213 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1091 |
| LMArena French | — | 1155 |
| LMArena German | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1005 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1120 |
Instruction Following Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1139 |
Long Context Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1144 |
Writing & Preference Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Yi-1.5-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Yi-1.5-34B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.