Model comparison
Gemma 3 12B vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 4 categories and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 12B leads 45.7 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 12B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 33.2 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1281 | 1149 |
| SciCode | 17.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 30.4% | — |
Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1309 | 1138 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 48.8% | — |
| LMCA | 4.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.5 | — |
Math Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1159 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1131 |
| GPQA Diamond | 39.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: —, Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MindCube | 46.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1068 |
| LMArena Russian | 1335 | 1063 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1139 |
| LMArena German | 1370 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1116 |
Long Context Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1317 | 1155 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1334 | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1334 | 1099 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1126 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 12B better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 12B or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.