Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct

Gemma 3 12B and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 32.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct in 4 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 12B leads 45.7 to 30.9.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct specifications
Gemma 3 12BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index32.132.4
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked2413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding12811186
SciCode17.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%27.1%

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13091145
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench48.8%—
LMCA4.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5—

Math Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Math13071152
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%—

Knowledge Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert12481142
GPQA Diamond39.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
MindCube46.7%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13181099
LMArena Russian13351092
LMArena Chinese—1145
LMArena German1370—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12991131

Long Context Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13171162

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Text13341150
LMArena Creative Writing13311129
LMArena Multi-Turn13341108
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Granite 3.1 8b Instruct?

Gemma 3 12B and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 32.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemma 3 12B or Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper