Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Granite 4.2 3b

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 4 categories and Granite 4.2 3b in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 26.0 to 15.7.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Granite 4.2 3b specifications
Gemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index32.139.4
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked2411

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Coding12811361
SciCode17.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%—

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Hard Prompts13091306
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench48.8%—
LMCA4.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5—

Math Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%—
LMArena Math1307—

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Expert12481315
GPQA Diamond39.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Granite 4.2 3b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
MindCube46.7%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Non-English13181268
LMArena Russian13351249
LMArena Chinese—1269
LMArena German1370—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Instruction Following12991273

Long Context Too close to call

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Longer Query13171291

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Text13341293
LMArena Creative Writing13311205
LMArena Multi-Turn13341290
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Granite 4.2 3b?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 12B or Granite 4.2 3b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Granite 4.2 3b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 3b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper