Model comparison

Gemma 3 12B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Gemma 3 12B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 12B leads 45.7 to 34.8.

Side by side

Gemma 3 12B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Gemma 3 12BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index32.132.7
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked2416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding12811210
SciCode17.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard30.4%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13091208
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench48.8%—
LMCA4.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5—

Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math13071208
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202516.7%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
GPQA Diamond39.5%—
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.4%—
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1248—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 12B: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MindCube46.7%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13181160
LMArena Russian13351187
LMArena Chinese—1192
LMArena German1370—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12991186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13171194

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text13341218
LMArena Creative Writing13311199
LMArena Multi-Turn13341221
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1126—
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Gemma 3 12B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemma 3 12B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper