Model comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs Llama 2-7B

Llama 2-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.6 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 1B Google

20.7

Rank #348 Reported

Llama 2-7B Meta

28.6

Rank #315 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 1 category and Llama 2-7B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 2-7B leads 27.7 to 7.1.

Side by side

Gemma 3 1B and Llama 2-7B specifications
Gemma 3 1BLlama 2-7B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index20.728.6
Released2025-03-122023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked429

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 2-7B
LMArena Coding—1002

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Llama 2-7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 2-7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard7.2%—

Reasoning Gemma 3 1B leads

Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 2-7B
Chess Puzzles0%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1009
BIG-Bench Hard—39.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—98.54
HellaSwag—77.2%
LAMBADA—73.3%
PIQA—78.8%
WinoGrande—69.2%

Math Llama 2-7B leads

Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 2-7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
LMArena Math—1042
GSM8K—16.7%

Knowledge Llama 2-7B leads

Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 2-7B
GPQA Diamond19.9%—
LMArena Expert—1036
ARC (AI2) Challenge—45.9%
BoolQ—77.9%
MMLU—45.8%
OpenBookQA—58.6%
TriviaQA—73.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 2-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 2-7B
ScienceQA—43.1%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 2-7B
LMArena Non-English—973
LMArena Chinese—973
LMArena French—969
LMArena German—978
LMArena Russian—995
LMArena Spanish—1007

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 2-7B
LMArena Instruction Following—1006

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 2-7B
LMArena Longer Query—999

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 2-7B
LMArena Text—1053
LMArena Creative Writing—1033
LMArena Multi-Turn—1029

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 1B better than Llama 2-7B?

Llama 2-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.6 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Llama 2-7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper