Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Phi-4 Mini
Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi-4 Mini leads 25.3 to 7.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 30.9 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Phi-4 Mini leads
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
Knowledge Phi-4 Mini leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Phi-4 Mini?
Phi-4 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.9 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.