Model comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 1B Google

21.1

Rank #353 Reported

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 10.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemma 3 1B and 100% for Qwen3.8 Max.
  • Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3 1B and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Gemma 3 1BQwen3.8 Max
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index21.156.8
Released2025-03-122026-08-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked439

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3.8 Max
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%
LMArena Coding—1502

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard7.2%—
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3.8 Max
Chess Puzzles0%40%
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1496
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3.8 Max
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%100%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1499

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3.8 Max
GPQA Diamond19.9%92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%
LMArena Expert—1507

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English—1472
LMArena Chinese—1538
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Russian—1481
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1479

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1489

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text—1483
LMArena Creative Writing—1479
LMArena Multi-Turn—1489

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen3.8 Max share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper