Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs o1-pro

Gemma 3 27B and o1-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.8

Rank #284 Confirmed

o1-pro OpenAI

31.5

Rank #271 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where o1-pro leads 29.7 to 25.5.
  • Gemma 3 27B is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.16 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
  • o1-pro accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 131K.
  • Gemma 3 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3 27B and o1-pro specifications
Gemma 3 27Bo1-pro
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index30.831.5
Released2025-03-112025-03-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K200K
Max output8K100K
Input $ / M tokens$0.08$150
Output $ / M tokens$0.16$600
Results tracked433

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334), o1-pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27Bo1-pro
Aider Polyglot4.9%—
SciCode21.2%—
LiveBench Coding39.9%—
LMArena Coding1322—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110), o1-pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27Bo1-pro
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard29.5%—

Reasoning o1-pro leads

Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27Bo1-pro
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
ARC-AGI-1—23.3%
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
EnigmaEval—6.1%
LiveBench Reasoning43.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1340—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis51.5%—
LMCA12.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.04—
LiveBench50%—

Math Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265), o1-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27Bo1-pro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202522.5%—
LiveBench Math55.4%—
LMArena Math1312—
MATH Level 574%—

Knowledge o1-pro leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27Bo1-pro
GPQA Diamond47.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam—8.1%
Confabulations40.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1304—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100), o1-pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27Bo1-pro
LMArena Vision1164—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155), o1-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27Bo1-pro
LMArena Non-English1334—
LMArena Chinese1346—
LMArena French1368—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1287—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Russian1349—
LMArena Spanish1349—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160), o1-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27Bo1-pro
LiveBench Instruction Following74.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1321—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293), o1-pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27Bo1-pro
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1333—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168), o1-pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27Bo1-pro
LMArena Text1358—
LMArena Creative Writing1346—
Short-Story Creative Writing79.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1266—
LMArena Multi-Turn1345—
LiveBench Language34.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than o1-pro?

Gemma 3 27B and o1-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or o1-pro?

Gemma 3 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.

Which has the bigger context window?

o1-pro does, with 200K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and o1-pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper