Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Gemma 3 27B and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.8

Rank #284 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 3 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3 27B leads 52.5 to 25.8.

Side by side

Gemma 3 27B and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Gemma 3 27BOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index30.830.3
Released2025-03-11—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.08—
Output $ / M tokens$0.16—
Results tracked4310

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding13221016
Aider Polyglot4.9%—
SciCode21.2%—
LiveBench Coding39.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BOlmo 7b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard29.5%—

Reasoning Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1340993
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning43.8%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis51.5%—
LMCA12.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.04—
LiveBench50%—

Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math13121018
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202522.5%—
LiveBench Math55.4%—
MATH Level 574%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BOlmo 7b Instruct
GPQA Diamond47.7%—
Confabulations40.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1304—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Vision1164—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1334977
LMArena Chinese13461014
LMArena Russian1349947
LMArena French1368—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1287—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Spanish1349—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1321978
LiveBench Instruction Following74.9%—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BOlmo 7b Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1333—

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text13581032
LMArena Creative Writing1346990
LMArena Multi-Turn13451007
Short-Story Creative Writing79.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1266—
LiveBench Language34.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Gemma 3 27B and Olmo 7b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemma 3 27B or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper