Model comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Ministral 3B

Gemma 3 4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.1 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 4B Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

26.2

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 1 category and Ministral 3B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Ministral 3B leads 26.6 to 16.8.
  • Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.10 for Ministral 3B.

Side by side

Gemma 3 4B and Ministral 3B specifications
Gemma 3 4BMinistral 3B
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index28.126.2
Released2025-03-122024-10-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K131K
Max output4K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.04$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.08$0.10
Results tracked226

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Ministral 3B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMinistral 3B
LMArena Coding1230—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Ministral 3B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMinistral 3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard19.6%—

Reasoning Ministral 3B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMinistral 3B
DTBench50.9%51.7%
LMCA2.8%5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index116.02118.1
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1253—

Math Ministral 3B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMinistral 3B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.5%—
LMArena Math1239—
MATH Level 5—14.4%

Knowledge Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMinistral 3B
GPQA Diamond23.2%25.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.4%7.3%
LMArena Expert1223—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Ministral 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMinistral 3B
LMArena Non-English1273—
LMArena German1281—
LMArena Russian1294—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Ministral 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMinistral 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1239—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Ministral 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMinistral 3B
LMArena Longer Query1273—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Ministral 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMinistral 3B
LMArena Text1291—
LMArena Creative Writing1271—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1068—
LMArena Multi-Turn1255—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Ministral 3B?

Gemma 3 4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.1 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Ministral 3B?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Ministral 3B lists at $0.10 and $0.10.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 131K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Ministral 3B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper