Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GPT-5.3 Chat

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 64× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

36.7

Rank #203 Confirmed

GPT-5.3 Chat OpenAI

42.1

Rank #109 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.3 Chat in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.3 to 50.3.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Chat.
  • GPT-5.3 Chat accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 33K.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-5.3 Chat specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.3 Chat
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index36.742.1
Released2025-05-202026-03-03
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window33K128K
Max output33K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$1.75
Output $ / M tokens$0.12$14
Results tracked1818

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), GPT-5.3 Chat: 40.8 (#124)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Coding12691408

Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), GPT-5.3 Chat: 27.3 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts12841399
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—

Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), GPT-5.3 Chat: 35.4 (#146)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Math12511389

Knowledge GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#137)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Expert12451397

Multilingual GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Non-English12851383
LMArena Chinese13101433
LMArena French13301398
LMArena German13121384
LMArena Japanese12741351
LMArena Korean12591347
LMArena Russian12881400
LMArena Spanish13051371

Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), GPT-5.3 Chat: 73.0 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Instruction Following12551378

Long Context GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#115)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Longer Query12771396

Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.3 (#65)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.3 Chat
LMArena Text13061389
LMArena Creative Writing12871356
LMArena Multi-Turn12761413
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1690

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GPT-5.3 Chat?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 64× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or GPT-5.3 Chat?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Chat lists at $1.75 and $14.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GPT-5.3 Chat better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.3 Chat does, with 128K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-5.3 Chat share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.3 Chat has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper