Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GPT-5.3 Chat
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 64× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.3 Chat in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.3 to 50.3.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.3 Chat.
- GPT-5.3 Chat accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 33K.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2025-05-20 | 2026-03-03 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 33K | 128K |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $1.75 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.12 | $14 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), GPT-5.3 Chat: 40.8 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1408 |
Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), GPT-5.3 Chat: 27.3 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1399 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), GPT-5.3 Chat: 35.4 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1389 |
Knowledge GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1397 |
Multilingual GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.5 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1383 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1433 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1398 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | 1384 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | 1351 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1400 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1371 |
Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), GPT-5.3 Chat: 73.0 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1378 |
Long Context GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1396 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5.3 Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1356 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1413 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1690 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GPT-5.3 Chat?
GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 64× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.3 Chat's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or GPT-5.3 Chat?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; GPT-5.3 Chat lists at $1.75 and $14.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GPT-5.3 Chat better for coding?
GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.3 Chat does, with 128K tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-5.3 Chat share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.3 Chat has 18.