Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GPT-5.4 nano

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

GPT-5.4 nano OpenAI

41.9

Rank #125 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 nano in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.4 nano leads 41.9 to 34.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 39.7% for GPT-5.4 nano.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-5.4 nano specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.4 nano
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index37.341.9
Released—2026-03-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$1.25
Results tracked1840

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), GPT-5.4 nano: 43.6 (#84)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Coding12681405
SciCode—46.9%
WeirdML—49.2%
ALE-Bench—1,005

Reasoning GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), GPT-5.4 nano: 23.7 (#173)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.4 nano
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%39.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts12841381
ARC-AGI-2—5.7%
ARC-AGI-1—51.5%
CritPt—9.3%
Chess Puzzles—30%
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
DTBench—80.3%
LMCA—36.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.81
ForecastBench—57.3

Math GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), GPT-5.4 nano: 40.9 (#88)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Math12511406
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—44.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—87.8%
ProofBench—5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—25.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—6.3%

Knowledge GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), GPT-5.4 nano: 41.9 (#103)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Expert12461396
GPQA Diamond—78.5%
SimpleQA Verified—11.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, GPT-5.4 nano: 36.7 (#78)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Vision—1196

Multilingual GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), GPT-5.4 nano: 48.6 (#140)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Non-English12851359
LMArena Chinese13091392
LMArena French13301396
LMArena German13111367
LMArena Japanese12721343
LMArena Korean12591320
LMArena Russian12881363
LMArena Spanish13051371

Instruction Following GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), GPT-5.4 nano: 71.9 (#144)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Instruction Following12551362

Long Context GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), GPT-5.4 nano: 41.6 (#137)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Longer Query12761366

Writing & Preference GPT-5.4 nano leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), GPT-5.4 nano: 55.7 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.4 nano
LMArena Text13061372
LMArena Creative Writing12871314
LMArena Multi-Turn12761382

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GPT-5.4 nano?

GPT-5.4 nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GPT-5.4 nano better for coding?

GPT-5.4 nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-5.4 nano share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 nano has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper