Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Gemma 3n E4b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#203); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT

Google

36.7

Rank #203 Confirmed

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

42.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 36.4.
Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 33K.
Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-6.1 Sol specifications
	Gemma 3n E4b IT	GPT-6.1 Sol
Provider	Google	OpenAI
Noometry Index	36.7	42.1
Released	2025-05-20	2026-09-29
Weights	Open	Proprietary
Context window	33K	1.05M
Max output	33K	128K
Input $ / M tokens	$0.06	$2
Output $ / M tokens	$0.12	$10
Results tracked	18	2

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	GPT-6.1 Sol
DeepSWE	—	75.2%
LMArena Coding	1269	—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	GPT-6.1 Sol
GDP.pdf	—	32%

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	GPT-6.1 Sol
Kagi LLM Benchmark	31.5%	—
LMArena Hard Prompts	1284	—

Math Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Math	1251	—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Expert	1245	—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Non-English	1285	—
LMArena Chinese	1310	—
LMArena French	1330	—
LMArena German	1312	—
LMArena Japanese	1274	—
LMArena Korean	1259	—
LMArena Russian	1288	—
LMArena Spanish	1305	—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Instruction Following	1255	—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Longer Query	1277	—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), GPT-6.1 Sol: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3n E4b IT	GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text	1306	—
LMArena Creative Writing	1287	—
LMArena Multi-Turn	1276	—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GPT-6.1 Sol?

Gemma 3n E4b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#203); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or GPT-6.1 Sol?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-6.1 Sol share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 2.