Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
Gemma 3n E4b IT and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 5 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 24.8 to 19.9.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 37.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1269 |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1255 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1265 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1238 |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1262 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1286 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1273 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1213 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1195 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1261 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1279 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1245 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1266 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1265 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?
Gemma 3n E4b IT and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.0 vs 37.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.