Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 34.2.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 45.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-11-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1428 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1357 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1406 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1403 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1414 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.