Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Molmo 2 8b
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 2 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Molmo 2 8b leads 25.6 to 19.9.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Molmo 2 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 39.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1287 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1081 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1276 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1270 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Molmo 2 8b?
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Molmo 2 8b share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.