Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K2.5 Instant
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Kimi K2.5 Instant score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 4 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 39.4.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0675 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.23 | — |
| Results tracked | 28 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | 1404 |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1484 |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | 1443 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1442 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1440 |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | 1254 |
Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1449 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1378 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1430 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1435 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1381 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1427 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Kimi K2.5 Instant score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.