Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Kimi K2.7 Code score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 43.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 39.0 to 21.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 35.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 54.1% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0675 / $0.23 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.7 Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 43.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-06-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0675 | $0.95 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.23 | $4 |
| Results tracked | 28 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | 1473 |
| SciCode | 40% | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | 54.1% |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | 886.23 |
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | 21% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | 149.97 |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | 95.6% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1470 | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Kimi K2.7 Code?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Kimi K2.7 Code score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 43.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Kimi K2.7 Code?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0675 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Kimi K2.7 Code share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.