Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.5

Rank #92 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 21.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 0% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 12% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.09 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index43.548.5
Released2026-04-022026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K1.05M
Max output33K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.09$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$0.28
Results tracked2819

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev13591637
SciCode40%51.3%
LMArena Coding14471504
WeirdML35.2%—
ALE-Bench927.17—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
CritPt0%12%
LMArena Hard Prompts14391482
Chess Puzzles6%—
DTBench74.9%—
LMCA29.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math14701468
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%—
ProofBench—63%

Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert14471501
GPQA Diamond73.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—

Multimodal Too close to call

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision12601259

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English14211434
LMArena Chinese14951511
LMArena French14601475
LMArena Russian14341409
LMArena Spanish14171456

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14201463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14281463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text14341455
LMArena Creative Writing14021400
LMArena Multi-Turn14411451
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1305—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper