Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Trinity Large Thinking
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Google
Arcee AISummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.7 to 34.9.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0765 / $0.26 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.80 for Trinity Large Thinking.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Arcee AI | |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0765 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.26 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 28 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156), Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | 1238 |
| SciCode | 40% | 36.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1446 | 1381 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
Reasoning Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1438 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1469 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1359 |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43), Trinity Large Thinking: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |
Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1422 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1372 |
| LMArena French | 1459 | 1374 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1338 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | 1356 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1312 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1334 |
Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110), Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1342 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Trinity Large Thinking?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0765 per million input tokens and $0.26 per million output tokens; Trinity Large Thinking lists at $0.25 and $0.80.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.8 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Trinity Large Thinking share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.