Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs GLM-4.5V
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.7 to 27.2.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | GLM-4.5V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2025-08-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.80 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290), GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1347 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247), GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1335 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225), GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1353 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248), GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | 1353 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 7B: —, GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282), GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1304 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1338 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1299 |
| LMArena French | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1335 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290), GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1311 |
Long Context GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277), GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1305 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297), GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1333 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than GLM-4.5V?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or GLM-4.5V better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and GLM-4.5V share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.