Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

Grok 4.5 xAI

55.0

Rank #25 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.5 leads 65.8 to 27.1.
  • Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 7BGrok 4.5
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index30.055.0
Released2024-02-212026-07-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked2752

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Grok 4.5: 52.2 (#35)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.5
LMArena Coding10481474
DeepSWE—53.8%
FrontierCode—42.4%
LMArena WebDev—1553
SciCode—54.1%
WeirdML—46.4%
ALE-Bench—1,309
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#17)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.5
APEX-Agents—56.2%
τ²-bench Banking—47.9%
PostTrainBench—23.4%
GBAEval—65.4%
GDP.pdf—14%
LMArena Search—1213
Vending-Bench 2—3,887

Reasoning Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Grok 4.5: 56.1 (#25)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10421462
Epoch Capabilities Index111.99153.92
ARC-AGI-2—52.6%
SimpleBench—70%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—83.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.9%
ARC-AGI-1—87.2%
CritPt—15.4%
Chess Puzzles—36%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—45.2%
Surface Evolver Bench—74.4%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Grok 4.5: 60.9 (#35)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.5
LMArena Math10661459
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—57.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—24.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.8%
ProofBench—31%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#24)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.5
LMArena Expert10011466
GPQA Diamond—93.4%
SimpleQA Verified—48.3%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Grok 4.5: 37.6 (#72)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.5
LMArena Vision—1288
Blueprint-Bench 2—27.3%
Furniture Assembly—22.5%
LMArena Document—1452

Multilingual Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Grok 4.5: 54.4 (#42)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.5
LMArena Non-English9991440
LMArena Chinese10351496
LMArena French10251456
LMArena Russian9931448
LMArena German—1446
LMArena Japanese—1428
LMArena Korean—1404
LMArena Spanish—1450

Instruction Following Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Grok 4.5: 76.0 (#48)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.5
LMArena Instruction Following10171446

Long Context Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#56)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.5
LMArena Longer Query10221463

Writing & Preference Grok 4.5 leads

Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Grok 4.5: 65.8 (#42)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.5
LMArena Text10561448
LMArena Creative Writing10241442
LMArena Multi-Turn9631456
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1579

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or Grok 4.5 better for coding?

Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.2 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Grok 4.5 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.5 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper