Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 19.9.
  • Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 7BGrok 4.6
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index30.056.9
Released2024-02-212026-08-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked2749

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Coding10481465
DeepSWE—67.5%
FrontierCode—48%
CursorBench—41.4%
LMArena WebDev—1617
FrontierSWE—25.3%
SciCode—56.5%
WeirdML—67.3%
ALE-Bench—1,508
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.6
APEX-Agents—65.3%
GDP.pdf—17.2%
Vending-Bench 2—9,047

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Hard Prompts10421447
Epoch Capabilities Index111.99156.44
ARC-AGI-2—67.1%
SimpleBench—75.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—80%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—19.7%
Chess Puzzles—40%
EBR-Bench—30.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
DTBench—97.3%
LMCA—48.5%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Math10661423
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—66%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—51%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Expert10011467
GPQA Diamond—94%
SimpleQA Verified—49.3%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 7B: —, Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Vision—1263
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.2%
Furniture Assembly—40%
LMArena Document—1452

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Non-English9991420
LMArena Chinese10351480
LMArena French10251461
LMArena Russian9931422
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1376
LMArena Korean—1397
LMArena Spanish—1404

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Instruction Following10171431

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Longer Query10221454

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)

BenchmarkGemma 7BGrok 4.6
LMArena Text10561428
LMArena Creative Writing10241428
LMArena Multi-Turn9631425

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Grok 4.6 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper