Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Gemma 7B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 4 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 4 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 7B leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1028 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1089 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 984 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1016 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1039 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1004 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1023 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 996 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Gemma 7B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 7B or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.5 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.