Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

30.0

Rank #299 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 2 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 45.6 to 27.1.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Gemma 7BTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index30.033.0
Released2024-02-212024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2714

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding10481235
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts10421220
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index111.99—
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math Gemma 7B leads

Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math10661242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
MATH Level 5—42.7%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge Gemma 7B leads

Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
LMArena Expert1001—
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multilingual Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English9991236
LMArena Chinese10351249
LMArena Russian9931246
LMArena French1025—

Instruction Following Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following10171233

Long Context Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query10221224

Writing & Preference Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text10561256
LMArena Creative Writing10241231
LMArena Multi-Turn9631252

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper