Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.7

Rank #169 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.4

Rank #324 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5-Air scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 56.1 to 27.7.

Side by side

GLM-4.5-Air and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
GLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Microsoft
Noometry Index38.727.4
Released2025-07-202024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output98K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.10—
Results tracked2735

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 34.5 (#225), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.1 (#319)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding13971093
GSO2.9%—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 23.3 (#166), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 13.6 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13791072
Kagi LLM Benchmark43%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
ForecastBench59.2—
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 33.8 (#166), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 24.5 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math13961111
Omni-MATH39.1%—
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 34.6 (#184), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.9 (#241)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert13701045
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%—
MMLU-Pro76.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 49.4 (#130), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.5 (#275)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13661021
LMArena Chinese14271021
LMArena French13991075
LMArena German13761044
LMArena Japanese1348935
LMArena Korean1306905
LMArena Russian13731022
LMArena Spanish13851084

Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 69.8 (#165), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 48.0 (#298)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13531053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%
IFEval81.2%—

Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#130), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#271)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13671044

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 56.1 (#134), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.7 (#295)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text13841073
LMArena Creative Writing13431037
LMArena Multi-Turn13711018
WildBench78.9%—
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.5-Air or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-4.5-Air scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper