Model comparison

GLM-4.5-Air vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

GLM-4.5-Air and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.9 vs 39.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.9

Rank #177 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5-Air scores higher in 4 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 49.1 to 43.7.
  • GLM-4.5-Air has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.5-Air and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
GLM-4.5-AirStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)StepFun
Noometry Index38.939.2
Released2025-07-20—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output98K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.10—
Results tracked2712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding13971316
GSO2.9%—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts13791299
Kagi LLM Benchmark43%—
ForecastBench59.2—

Math Too close to call

GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math13961304
Omni-MATH39.1%—

Knowledge Too close to call

GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert13701279
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%—
MMLU-Pro76.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English13661290
LMArena Chinese14261331
LMArena Russian13731324
LMArena French1399—
LMArena German1377—
LMArena Japanese1348—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Spanish1386—

Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following13541287
IFEval81.2%—

Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query13661307

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads

GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5-AirStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text13841321
LMArena Creative Writing13431328
LMArena Multi-Turn13711292
WildBench78.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

GLM-4.5-Air and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.9 vs 39.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is GLM-4.5-Air or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper