Model comparison

GLM-4.5V vs Longcat Flash Chat

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5V Z.ai (Zhipu)

39.8

Rank #158 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 1 category and Longcat Flash Chat in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 52.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 59.8% for GLM-4.5V and 43.9% for Longcat Flash Chat.

Side by side

GLM-4.5V and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
GLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Meituan
Noometry Index39.842.1
Released2025-08-11—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window64K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.60—
Output $ / M tokens$1.80—
Results tracked1519

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding13471471

Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads

GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
Kagi LLM Benchmark59.8%43.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts13341440
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math13541442

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert13531454

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92), Longcat Flash Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Vision1154—

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English13031404
LMArena Chinese13371465
LMArena Russian12981395
LMArena Spanish13361445
LMArena French—1456
LMArena German—1408
LMArena Japanese—1373
LMArena Korean—1371

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following13111411

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query13041425

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text13331427
LMArena Creative Writing12951388
LMArena Multi-Turn13321418

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5V better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-4.5V or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Longcat Flash Chat share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper