Model comparison

GLM-4.5V vs MiniMax M1

GLM-4.5V and MiniMax M1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.2 vs 39.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5V Z.ai (Zhipu)

39.2

Rank #158 Confirmed

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

39.7

Rank #146 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax M1 in 6 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • MiniMax M1 is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $1.80 for GLM-4.5V.
  • MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 64K.

Side by side

GLM-4.5V and MiniMax M1 specifications
GLM-4.5VMiniMax M1
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)MiniMax
Noometry Index39.239.7
Released2025-08-112025-06-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window64K1M
Max output16K40K
Input $ / M tokens$0.60$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$1.80$2.20
Results tracked1518

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152), MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMiniMax M1
LMArena Coding13471359

Reasoning Too close to call

GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118), MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMiniMax M1
LMArena Hard Prompts13351340
Kagi LLM Benchmark59.8%—

Math Too close to call

GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157), MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMiniMax M1
LMArena Math13531360

Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads

GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155), MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMiniMax M1
LMArena Expert13531316

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86), MiniMax M1: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMiniMax M1
LMArena Vision1154—

Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads

GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172), MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMiniMax M1
LMArena Non-English13041320
LMArena Chinese13381361
LMArena Russian12991330
LMArena Spanish13351354
LMArena French—1369
LMArena German—1350
LMArena Japanese—1220
LMArena Korean—1263

Instruction Following Too close to call

GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170), MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMiniMax M1
LMArena Instruction Following13111312

Long Context MiniMax M1 leads

GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMiniMax M1
LMArena Longer Query13051326
Fiction.LiveBench—69.4%

Writing & Preference Too close to call

GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162), MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.5VMiniMax M1
LMArena Text13331343
LMArena Creative Writing12951298
LMArena Multi-Turn13331335

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.5V better than MiniMax M1?

GLM-4.5V and MiniMax M1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.2 vs 39.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5V lists at $0.60 and $1.80.

Is GLM-4.5V or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.9 vs 39.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 64K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and MiniMax M1 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper