Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 1 category and Muse Glimmer in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Muse Glimmer leads 50.6 to 44.9.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1417 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
Reasoning Too close to call
GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | 1395 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1353 | 1419 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1388 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | 1393 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1374 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | 1398 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5V or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.9 vs 38.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.