Model comparison
GLM-4.6 vs Muse Glimmer
GLM-4.6 and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.4 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6 scores higher in 6 categories and Muse Glimmer in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6 leads 61.1 to 57.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 38.4% for GLM-4.6 and 44.9% for Muse Glimmer.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2025-09-30 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GLM-4.6: 40.1 (#148), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1340 | 1355 |
| SciCode | 38.4% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1449 | 1416 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 55.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 340.82 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.6: 32.3 (#66), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 24.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 72.4% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
GLM-4.6: 23.7 (#172), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.1% | 2.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1396 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 47.4% | — |
Math Too close to call
GLM-4.6: 39.1 (#111), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | 1417 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.6 leads
GLM-4.6: 40.2 (#124), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | 1386 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.5% | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.6 leads
GLM-4.6: 53.5 (#66), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1499 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1419 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1459 | — |
| LMArena German | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1436 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6 leads
GLM-4.6: 74.3 (#98), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1410 | 1375 |
Long Context GLM-4.6 leads
GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#94), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6 leads
GLM-4.6: 61.1 (#90), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1440 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1399 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6 better than Muse Glimmer?
GLM-4.6 and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.4 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is GLM-4.6 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.1 vs 40.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6 and Muse Glimmer share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6 has 29 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.