Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Granite 4.2 3b
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 4.2 3b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 47.2.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 3b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1361 |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1306 |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1315 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Granite 4.2 3b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1268 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1249 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1273 |
Long Context GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1291 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Granite 4.2 3b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1293 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1205 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Granite 4.2 3b?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Granite 4.2 3b better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 40.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Granite 4.2 3b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 3b has 11.