Model comparison

GLM-4.6V vs Llama 3.2 90B

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 12, 2026. 1 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.6V Z.ai (Zhipu)

41.3

Rank #137 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 90B

Summary

They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.6V leads 38.0 to 21.7.

Side by side

GLM-4.6V and Llama 3.2 90B specifications
	GLM-4.6V	Llama 3.2 90B
Provider	Z.ai (Zhipu)	Meta
Noometry Index	41.3	27.5
Released	2025-12-08	2024-09-24
Weights	Open	Open
Context window	128K	—
Max output	33K	—
Input $ / M tokens	$0.30	—
Output $ / M tokens	$0.90	—
Results tracked	12	9

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.6V	Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Coding	1390	—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.6V	Llama 3.2 90B
BALROG	—	27.3%

Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.6V	Llama 3.2 90B
EnigmaEval	—	0.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts	1368	—
Epoch Capabilities Index	—	125.5

Math Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.6V	Llama 3.2 90B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	—	2.6%
MATH Level 5	—	39.4%

Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.6V	Llama 3.2 90B
GPQA Diamond	—	41%
LMArena Expert	1371	—
MMLU	—	80.3%

Multimodal GLM-4.6V leads

GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.6V	Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Vision	1164	1000
GeoBench	—	52%

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.6V	Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Non-English	1359	—
LMArena Chinese	1425	—
LMArena Russian	1340	—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.6V	Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Instruction Following	1352	—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.6V	Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Longer Query	1358	—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	GLM-4.6V	Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Text	1377	—
LMArena Creative Writing	1347	—
LMArena Multi-Turn	1360	—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.6V better than Llama 3.2 90B?