Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs MiMo-V2-Flash
GLM-4.6V and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-4.6V leads 40.9 to 36.1.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for GLM-4.6V.
- MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1425 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1462 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1392 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
GLM-4.6V and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GLM-4.6V lists at $0.30 and $0.90.
Is GLM-4.6V or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.